Hello All, I am using CIDR lookups and am getting some warnings when it doesn't like certain IP blocks in my CIDR list. I'm wondering if it doesn't like the 4th octet of the IP's being a zero. Any help appreciated!
Here is a small piece of the log file: -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4151: non-null host address bits in "194.149.65.0/23", perhaps you should use "194.149.64.0/23" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4923: non-null host address bits in "122.169.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "122.168.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4925: non-null host address bits in "122.167.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "122.166.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4928: non-null host address bits in "122.161.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "122.160.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4930: non-null host address bits in "123.111.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "123.110.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4931: non-null host address bits in "123.109.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "123.108.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4935: non-null host address bits in "122.47.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "122.46.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4940: non-null host address bits in "121.247.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "121.246.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4941: non-null host address bits in "121.35.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "121.34.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 4943: non-null host address bits in "121.97.0.0/15", perhaps you should use "121.96.0.0/15" instead: skipping this rule -----------------[MsgHour:1326.32]------------------------------[ TMsg:21]---[GMsg:7 33%]---[TSpam:14 67%]-----[RunTime:57 seconds]------- INFO: Nov 17 11:38:28 pluto postfix/smtpd[5974]: warning: cidr map /etc/postfix/CIDR, line 5395: non-null host address bits in "117.195.0.0/9", perhaps you should use "117.128.0.0/9" instead: skipping this rule
