On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:14:04PM +0100, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
>
>
> Il 18/11/2010 17:08, Victor Duchovni ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:00:31PM +0100, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
>>
>>> Thank's a lot, but in this configuration i've only one node by MX dns
>>> record?
>> You could list both hosts for resiliency. Each will forward mail it
>> does not own to the other.
>>
> Thank's so i can declare two dns mx record with the same priority?
> Like:
>
> example.com MX host1.example.com 10
> example.com MX host2.example.com 10
You can figure this out for yourself.
$ dig +noall +ans -t mx google.com
google.com. 894 IN MX 400 google.com.s9b2.psmtp.com.
google.com. 894 IN MX 100 google.com.s9a1.psmtp.com.
google.com. 894 IN MX 300 google.com.s9b1.psmtp.com.
google.com. 894 IN MX 200 google.com.s9a2.psmtp.com.
--
Viktor.
