On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 03:48:34PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-03-05 9:29 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > always_bcc is exactly what I would do
>
> But isn't there a problem with the loss of all of the headers when using
> always_bcc and if so, isn't that a problem with respect to most of the
> laws mandating email archival?
Not headers, envelope. You lose the envelope recipient list. That's
why recipient_bcc_maps is better, since one can encode the original
recipients into the bcc recipient list.
--
Viktor.
