My work is a HUGE institution and there are just a few of us old
unix dudes around who use command line (and cron) for such things
so they will not allow any changes as you suggest.

Otherwise, I agree that it IS an ugly/wrong solution, but the only one at
my disposal...  --mike

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Victor Duchovni
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:46:57PM -0400, Michael Way wrote:
>
>> I have a setup where I use postfix to connect to my work smtpd
>> exchange server via TLS encryption
>> and normal login authentication. This smtpd server also requires that
>> the "From" address in the email header
>> is from the same user that authenticates, otherwise I get a:
>> "Client does not have permissions to send as this sender"
>>
>> I can send emails via this system just fine using mutt or whatever
>> command line mail I like,
>> BUT I also use fetchmail to get email from our IMAP server.
>> I then use a .forward file to keep a local copy AND send a copy to
>> gmail as a backup.
>
> Why authenticate? If mail is sent *to* your mailbox, unlike submission,
> the server should allow all the mail to be sent to your mailbox. Work
> with the server administrator to treat this as "inbound" mail, not
> submission of new email.
>
> Munging the "From:" address is an ugly wrong solution.
>
> --
>        Viktor.
>

Reply via email to