Rich:
> > Do not use this patch. ?It silently ignores database lookup errors.
> >
> > Postfix will bounce or mis-deliver mail instead of holding off until
> > the database is fixed.
>
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> > See my other post with the details of what is wrong with this code.
>
> Got it. Reading thru the referenced posts, too.
>
> As for implementation goals -- if (and not yet convinced, myself)
> StoredFunctions do the trick with current src, is anything required to
> be done? Or is the goal of 'officially' supporting both Stored Funcs
> & Procs a 'good thing'?
Your post suggests that Postfix supports stored procedures that
return a single result (not a set). That may be a nice workaround.
Support for multiple result sets may be useful (whether from stored
procedure or multiple queries). I can't say, because I don't use
DBMSes with Postfix, and I don't have time to find out. If someone
wants to make a contribution, my previous email has all the pointers
to find out what it would take.
Wietse
