Sahil Tandon:
> I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
> you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
> created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
Considering the short time left before the next stable release I
am considering the following schedule:
- Revert to Postfix 2.8 behavior, and complete the 2.9 release cycle.
- In the 2.10 development cycle, make Postfix build on hosts that
have no network interfaces. That would eliminate problems like
Mark's hosts without IPv4, FreeBSD "port" builds on hosts with
dysfunctional IPv6, and other weird environments.
- In the 2.10 development cycle, (re)start the first phase of the
IPv6-on-by-default transition, and do this early enough that there
is time to make sure that all maintainers are on board.
Wietse
-
