On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 16:00:26 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0400, Sahil Tandon writes:
> > On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 13:48:17 +0200, Pavel Gulchouck wrote:
> 
> >> I use recipient_delimiter feature and procmail processing local
> >> delivery.  Messages for me+sms goes to sms, for me+xmpp - to jabber
> >> etc.
> >> 
> >> But if I want to receive a message both to xmpp and sms, I have a
> >> problem, because cleanup decides that me+xmpp and me+sms is the
> >> same user, and leaves only one copy of the message.
> 
> > Do you have logs of this occurring?
> 
> Additional info: this happens when destination is alias which expands
> to list of addresses contain user+ext1 and user+ext2.

Rather than providing tidbits of information, would you share the output
of 'postconf -n' and other relevant information as described in
DEBUG_README?

> In my test, /etc/aliases contains:
> gul-test:          gul+1, gul+2
> 
> Here's mail.log of sending mail to gul-test:
> 
> Mar 17 13:50:00 mon postfix/pickup[31038]: 35847F90660: uid=1013 from=<gul>
> Mar 17 13:50:00 mon postfix/cleanup[11341]: 35847F90660: 
> message-id=<[email protected]>
> Mar 17 13:50:00 mon postfix/qmgr[7754]: 35847F90660: from=<[email protected]>, 
> size=327, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Mar 17 13:50:01 mon postfix/local[11413]: 35847F90660: 
> to=<[email protected]>, orig_to=<gul-test>, relay=local, delay=1, 
> delays=0/0/0/1, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: procmail -a 
> "$EXTENSION")
> Mar 17 13:50:01 mon postfix/qmgr[7754]: 35847F90660: removed

FWIW, I cannot reproduce this, though I do not hand mail off to
procmail:

Mar 17 10:40:35 mx1 postfix/local[67468]: 2FD108A05B:
to=<[email protected]>, orig_to=<[email protected]>,
relay=local, delay=0.47, delays=0.46/0.01/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
(delivered to maildir)
Mar 17 10:40:35 mx1 postfix/local[67468]: 2FD108A05B:
to=<[email protected]>, orig_to=<[email protected]>,
relay=local, delay=0.47, delays=0.46/0.01/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
(delivered to maildir)

-- 
Sahil Tandon

Reply via email to