On 5/6/2012 1:16 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 19:49:18 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> If this discrepancy is reproducible let me know. Otherwise I >> will not lose sleep over this. > > Fair enough; I will not report back unless I am able to reproduce it. Hi Sahil, Have you considered the running dnsbl checks in tandem in smtpd_foo_restrictions? The results should already be cached by your local resolver, so there's really no downside, unless you don't consider Zen and/or spameatingmonkey safe for direct rejection in lieu of a scoring system. ISTR others mentioning they use this as a backstop to postscreen in the event the 6/2 second timeout is exceeded. -- Stan
