* James Seymour <jseym...@linxnet.com>: > Hi All, > > I'm using the SPF policy daemon. Works great (or appears to, anyway), > save one thing: The rejects claim "Recipient address rejected," when, > in reality, it's the sender's address that's being rejected. This leads > to confusion. > > Short of reworking my rules so I can place the SPF check under > smtpd_sender_restrictions (I have everything under recipient > restrictions), which I'm guessing would fix the problem, is there any > way to persuade SPF policy daemon rejects to say the right thing?
Actually it's postfix reporting this, so your approach of putting it into smtpd_sender_restrictions is looking better -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
