On 1/9/2013 12:26 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 3:38 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> <qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
> 
>> Should I have RBLs in smtpd_relay_restrictions instead?  Or should
>> I have
>> moved permit_sasl_authenticated into
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions?  Or
>> something else entirely?
> 
> Thanks Noel and Patrick for the responses.  I accidentally deleted
> them when removing the thread on destination_rate_delay, but grabbed
> them from the archives.
> 
> For port 465, should I do the same thing as with the submission
> port, i.e., clear out permit_{client, helo, sender, recipient,
> relay, data, end_of_data}_restrictions as necessary?
> 
> --Quanah

Submission and "smtps" perform essentially the same function, and
should get identical settings, with the obvious addition of tls
wrappermode for smtps.



  -- Noel Jones

Reply via email to