On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote: > On 1/31/2013 5:59 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >> i wanted to have an experienced suggestion from Pros. i have been >> going through from different steps deploying clamav and spamassassin, >> one is "mailscanner" and seccond one is "clamd with clamsmtp" >> in your expert opinion which one is the right track to choose. like >> which one is efficient in perspective of hardware utilization / >> resources utilization , complexity and more appropriate approach >> towards stable deployment. >> >> Thanks >> > > > Neither. If you only want to do virus scanning, use the > clamav-milter included with clamav. > > Mailscanner is "not recommended" for use with postfix. clamsmtp is > more complicated than using the bundled clamav-milter. > since i am new and just trying to explore things so would you please share why not mailscanner? for my learning
Thanks, > clamav-milter integrates easily with postfix, is reliable, and has > fewer third-party dependencies compared to the other choices. > > > Also consider using the add-on Sanesecurity anti-spam signatures for > clamav. I've found them to be quite useful with very low false > positives. > http://www.sanesecurity.com/ > > > > -- Noel Jones
