/dev/rob0 opined on Wednesday 06-Mar-2013@17:26:02 > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:52:35AM -0700, LuKreme wrote: >> The bad word begins with u and then is followed by n, s, u, b, an >> archaic word meaning a person who is employed in writing, and then >> a final d. >> >> u, n, s, u, b, >> scribe >> d > > Cute. :) > >> I [bad word] from a mailing list but the company continues to send >> emails, so I was considering adding them to my header_checks.pcre >> file >> >> /^Received:.*cinemark\.com / >> REJECT You refuse to respect [badword-d] requests, welcome to >> the blacklist. >> >> But I thought, before I do this, I better double check that this is >> the best way to do this. > > Almost surely not. You probably want a check_client_access > restriction to reject all mail from that[those] IP address[es]. Even > a check_sender_access would be better.
I have no way of knowing all the IPs, they use some remailer service, and I don not want to block the remailer because they are not the problem. > A good rule of thumb: never do something in the message content if > you can accomplish the same thing with the envelope. Another one: > header_checks(5) are rarely useful. I find the date checks useful (to reject messages with future/past dates). -- There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still So they break the hearts of kith and kin, And they roam the world at will.