Am 30.03.2013 17:03, schrieb Dennis Putnam: > Here's 2 (the ones I use the most) where bottom posting gets complaints. > > rusht...@csdco.com > cufsalumni-l...@bellsouth.com
refer this idiots to some examples like: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Proper_posting_style http://ffmpeg.org/contact.html and look at this message to understand the problem * you write a message * you become a answer at bottom * you answer on top how do you imagine that anybody can follow the thread? > On 3/30/2013 11:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 30.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Dennis Putnam: >>> On 3/30/2013 11:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>> please try to understand that nobody can answer your questions >>>>>> without any useful information! >>>>>> >>>>>> * why should "debug_level" indicate a authentication failure? >>>>>> * what sort of typo >>>>>> >>>>>> provide a valid example >>>>>> >>>>> Sorry. Habit. I get the opposite complaint from all my other lists >>>> impossible >>>> >>>> you get only the opposite complaint if you post complete logfiles >>>> and complete, unspecific and large configuration files instead >>>> post specific parts >>>> >>>> with the informations you posted in this thread you get a complaint >>>> on ANY mailing-list or no answer at all because our crystal balls >>>> are broken and so we need infos about what someone speaks to give >>>> answers >>> Are we talking about the same thing? Top posting rather than bottom posting? >> no - but the same: >> show me ONE list where you get no complaint for top-posting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
