On 2013-05-22 1:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:17 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
<cmar...@media-brokers.com> wrote:
On 2013-05-22 12:38 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com> wrote:
Both 1.0.1c and 1.0.1d had *serious* problems. Unless you can
absolutely confirm that Gentoo has applied all of the patches from
both of those releases to their build, I would strongly advise you to
roll your own 1.0.1e release.
Ok, but I'd prefer to check this out first and get gentoo to
update/stabilize 1.0.1e...
Any pointers/links to anything outlining said serious problems?
Thanks for the heads up...
I would read the CHANGES file shipped with OpenSSL. They didn't
document the changes between 1.0.1d and 1.0.1e, but you can see the
changes between 1.0.1c and 1.0.1d.
I did, and nothing jumps out at me (but I'm not a programmer, so that
isn't worth much).
Also, the gentoo devs don't know of any issues, and asked for pointers
to details.
The patches currently applied to the 1.0.1c ebuild are:
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.0a-ldflags.patch #327421
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.0d-fbsd-amd64.patch #363089
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.0d-windres.patch #373743
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.0h-pkg-config.patch
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.1-parallel-build.patch
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.1-x32.patch
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-1.0.1-ipv6.patch
If no pointers can be provided explaining these 'serious issues', then I
don't see how they could be all that serious.
--
Best regards,
Charles
