On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Stefan Foerster
<cite+postfix-us...@incertum.net> wrote:
> While I certainly share your view on this - though I would have worded
> it less strongly - my question still stands: Does anyone have real world
> data to share (e.g. "we disabled ciphers X, Y and Z and then N percent
> of clients failed back to plain"), or a pointer to some (semi-)official
> documentation, scientific papers or the like about this?

Can check both Google and Facebook findings.

http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/saferemail/

https://www.facebook.com/notes/protect-the-graph/the-current-state-of-smtp-starttls-deployment/1453015901605223
(facebook account required)

José Borges Ferreira

Reply via email to