--On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 6:56 PM +0000 Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:

While the above might be seen as an attempt to dissuade you from
looking into this further, the goal is to get past any magical
"wouldn't it be nice if" thinking and find out whether people really
understand what it is they're asking for, and whether they still
want it after they understand what it is they might get.

Opportunistic TLS with no authentication works just fine with a
just a self-signed certificate, bearing no name in particular.

Thanks Victor,

I will take this back to the clients. I'm guessing what they really just want is encrypted SMTPD, which as you note, can work just fine with any valid certificate setup.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Server Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Reply via email to