Wietse Venema: > This week I fixed a problem or PREPEND actions in access maps or > policy server reponses that was giving problems with DMARC setups > that combine of SPF policy server with a DKIM Milter. > > Meanwhile, Christian R??ner has pointed out that there still is a > different problem with [visibility of headers inserted with Milter > requests] > > To avoid [incompatibility] with Sendmail, Postfix would have to > implement the same behavior as Sendmail: ignore the MTA's own > received header when reporting headers to Milters, but don't ignore > the MTA's own received header when receiving Milter requests [...].
I have patches for evaluation: Postfix 2.12 released 20140918 or later: ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.patch ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.patch.asc ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.patch.sig Postfix 2.8, 2.9. 2.10, 2.11, and Postfix 2.12 released before 20140918: ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11.patch ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11.patch.asc ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/feature-patches/20141017-milter-auto-header-hide-2.12.11.patch.sig This just shows how little the Postfix Milter implementation has changed over time. Wietse
