Hai, I thinking why not put them together....
Ik run a setup like this https://wiki.dest-unreachable.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15892484 which uses postscreen spamassassin clamav and this works very wel for me. And the load is not to much, but depends on the amount of emails your processing. The extra thing i added in above setup is fail2ban + ufw to offload the dns queries and the server a bit. I created the following in fail2ban. Jail.local [postfix-dnsblog] enabled = true port = all filter = postfix-dnsblog banaction = ufw-all maxretry = 1 logpath = /var/log/mail.log bantime = 84600 and in filter.d/postfix-dnsblog.conf [INCLUDES] before = common.conf [Definition] failregex = addr <HOST> listed by domain and the action /etc/fail2ban/action.d/ufw-all.conf # Fail2Ban configuration file [Definition] actionstart = actionstop = actioncheck = actionban = ufw insert 1 deny from <ip> to any actionunban = ufw delete deny from <ip> to any Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: li...@planetcobalt.net [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] > Namens Ansgar Wiechers > Verzonden: donderdag 10 september 2015 9:27 > Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org > Onderwerp: Re: Can Postscreen and Smapassassin be used together > > On 2015-09-10 Robert Chalmers wrote: > > I’m currently running postscreen, and am wondering how I would add > > spamassassin to the main.cf configuration, or are they mutually > > exclusive? > > I'm not sure if they technically can't be used together, but they > shouldn't be. Spamassassin is rather heavyweight whereas Postscreen was > designed to be a lightweight zombie deflection tool. You'd lose that > low resource impact advantage by mixing the two. > > Regards > Ansgar Wiechers > -- > "Abstractions save us time working, but they don't save us time learning." > --Joel Spolsky
