No, you can use PCRE lists with check_sender_access too.
I use it successfully to block certain tld's and partial domains.

However, I would suggest using DISCARD instead of REJECT. With REJECT, you tell 
the spammer that he got blocked, thus he will switch to a new domain.
With DISCARD, it will silently "swallow" the email (eg pipe it to /dev/null), 
thus the spammer will think the email got through the spam filter.
(However, only use DISCARD with hosts/domains you are 100% sure its spam 
related and no legit mail will ever originate from that particular host or 
domain, if unsure, use REJECT instead).

Best regards, Sebastian Nielsen

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] 
För Sebastian Wolfgarten
Skickat: den 31 januari 2016 14:03
Till: Sebastian Nielsen <sebast...@sebbe.eu>
Kopia: postfix-users@postfix.org
Ämne: Re: PCRE regex in header_checks ignored - why? [Invalid]

Hi Sebastian,

yes but this would require me to actually know all the hostnames upfront, i.e. 
I cannot use a PCRE regex if I am not mistaken, or?

Thanks.

Best regards
Sebastian

> Am 31.01.2016 um 12:52 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen <sebast...@sebbe.eu>:
> 
> I would suggest use check_sender_access intead of header checks. Then you can 
> reject based on MAIL FROM:, since apparently the hosts are using their e**. 
> hostname in MAIL FROM.
> 
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org 
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] För Sebastian Wolfgarten
> Skickat: den 31 januari 2016 11:56
> Till: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Ämne: PCRE regex in header_checks ignored - why? [Invalid]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a problem with a PCRE-based rule in header_checks which seems 
> to be ignored and I can’t understand why this is the case. Hopefully 
> you guys have an idea on how to fix this :-)
> 
> So here is my setup: I am using Postfix 2.11.7 on FreeBSD 10 and as I am 
> being bombarded with emails from certain hosts in France (and I have no idea 
> why). These hosts are always following this format:
> 
> letter e
> 1-2 digit number
> hostname
> .fr
> 
> Here are some samples from today:
> 
> e16.sodipoc.fr
> e38.info-essentiel.fr
> e42.1jour1news.fr
> 
> I have defined a rule in SpamAssassin which successfully marks the related 
> spam accordingly (works like a charm):
> 
> header French_Spam ALL =~ / e\d{1,2}\.\S+\.fr /i score French_Spam 4.8
> 
> Now I am trying not to mark the unsolicited emails anymore but block them 
> entirely. As such I have defined the following rule in header_checks based on 
> the rule that I have defined in SpamAssassin:
> 
> /e\d{1,2}\.\S+\.fr/i REJECT French Spam
> 
> I reloaded Postfix (postmap is not necessary for PCRE files, or?) but still I 
> have received three spam mails today. Still the rule seems okay from my 
> perspective - here is a test of the rule with three hosts I have received 
> spam from today:
> 
> $ postmap -q "e16.sodipoc.fr" pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks REJECT 
> French Spam
> 
> $ postmap -q "e38.info-essentiel.fr" pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks 
> REJECT French Spam
> 
> $ postmap -q "e42.1jour1news.fr" pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks 
> REJECT French Spam
> 
> Any idea why this is happening?
> 
> Here an extract of the headers of one of the emails received today (note: The 
> message was marked as spam by Postfix but I manually removed all the related 
> headers and information not to end up in your spam filters):
> 
> Return-Path: <bou...@e42.1jour1news.fr>
> Delivered-To: sebast...@wolfgarten.com
> Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4154D704B9
>       for <sebast...@wolfgarten.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:06:58 +0100 (CET)
> X-Quarantine-ID: <xg91jhFD9UJP>
> Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1])
>       by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
> 10024)
>       with LMTP id xg91jhFD9UJP for <sebast...@wolfgarten.com>;
>       Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:06:44 +0100 (CET)
> X-Greylist: delayed 300 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at waldfest; Sun, 31 
> Jan 2016 11:06:44 CET
> Received: from e42.1jour1news.fr (e42.1jour1news.fr [62.210.13.102])
>       by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6750704AC
>       for <sebast...@wolfgarten.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:06:44 +0100 (CET)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=key; 
> d=e42.1jour1news.fr;  
> h=List-Unsubscribe:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
>  i=s...@e42.1jour1news.fr;  bh=zQj93n30egRyo2hFB5OnJZSylLw=;  
> b=FSLGriDlKRcl/NXBkxXU7ANj7JEO3+ltGllwY3hZu2bXxjJLXjFbz+fTZljB2BHbYMaKFmZxd6cF
>   6OhoV689FNZPqC1SBUt7rA2qMTRP0gqpuCGkMqTZ9KaSObrSNlZgCsxnsOuLWt7zrjF1OHL6jT8C
>   y0Nre8XUjO0vR+d2Jbs=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=key; d=e42.1jour1news.fr;  
> b=Y4c0lfDPkQ4YaimLaY4exKzB9WpnZVLpQ+HP7976BIB5gFzWEIF+n9wYB7afXxThUNNWaomOHcJs
>   LxgAMqLl9nmkNLI6FRS0zn3cC/Pq8wUoUxdhyity3JWxiTo3q12ZP2/UxsYaOcWccB03Ch8VsB2u
>   9dhJQsHlnHCxcvj2Grs=;
> List-Unsubscribe: 
> <http://link.lilinews.fr/t/u/mT2NTvqG3IQSUL1gyO7Px8zP42vuolnECda87eT2b
> ELfB63CFJolSx2R-d9wMmfhSsIzs-RQFBJ7mGmt1RffM79Wt7YeSHwsbbVWTpjRwEE>
> Message-ID: 
> <1454234504.tinkiwinkilalapo56addb880b...@link.lilinews.fr>
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:01:44 +0100
> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?15=E2=82=AC?= offerts sur la nouvelle collection
> 
> Finally, here is Postfix config:
> 
> alias_maps = 
> hash:/etc/aliases,mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
> body_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/body_checks,pcre:/etc/postfix/bad_urls
> canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/rewrite command_directory = 
> /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix content_filter = 
> amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024 daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix 
> data_directory = /var/db/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 debugger_command 
> = PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin ddd 
> $daemon_directory/$process_name $process_id & sleep 5 
> default_destination_concurrency_limit = 20 
> dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1 header_checks = 
> pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks html_directory = 
> /usr/share/doc/postfix in_flow_delay = 1s inet_interfaces = all 
> inet_protocols = ipv4 local_destination_concurrency_limit = 2 
> mail_owner = postfix mail_spool_directory = /var/mail 
> mailbox_size_limit = 0 mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq manpage_directory = 
> /usr/share/man message_size_limit = 0 milter_default_action = accept 
> milter_protocol = 2 mlmmj_destination_recipient_limit = 1 
> mydestination = $myhostname, sms.wolfgarten.com mydomain = 
> wolfgarten.com myhostname = waldfest.wolfgarten.com mynetworks = 
> ***REMOVED*** mynetworks_style = host myorigin = $myhostname 
> newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases non_smtpd_milters = 
> $smtpd_milters propagate_unmatched_extensions = virtual 
> queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = 
> /usr/share/doc/postfix receive_override_options = no_address_mappings 
> recipient_delimiter = + sample_directory = /etc/postfix sendmail_path 
> = /usr/sbin/sendmail setgid_group = maildrop smtpd_banner = 
> $myhostname ESMTP smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_milters = 
> inet:127.0.0.1:8891 smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, 
> reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, 
> permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, 
> reject_unauth_pipelining, reject_invalid_hostname, 
> reject_unknown_sender_domain, check_sender_access 
> hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access, check_client_access 
> cidr:/etc/postfix/access-client, reject_rbl_client 
> b.barracudacentral.org, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, 
> reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net, reject_rbl_client 
> bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client 
> truncate.gbudb.net, reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, 
> check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10023 smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender 
> = yes smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, 
> permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination 
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth 
> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot smtpd_sender_restrictions = 
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access, 
> permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, 
> reject_unauth_destination, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, 
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unknown_sender_domain, 
> reject_non_fqdn_sender soft_bounce = no transport_maps = 
> regexp:/etc/postfix/transport,hash:/var/spool/mlmmj/transport
> unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 virtual_alias_maps = 
> hash:/etc/postfix/virtual,hash:/var/spool/mlmmj/virtual,mysql:/etc/pos
> tfix/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf virtual_mailbox_domains = 
> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_domain_maps.cf
> virtual_mailbox_maps = 
> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_mailbox_maps.cf
> virtual_transport = dovecot
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards
> Sebastian
> 
> 


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to