Am 22.05.2016 um 19:00 schrieb Phil Stracchino: > On 05/22/16 12:30, Robert Schetterer wrote: >> loose mail means silent discard, this should never happen >> you might not get the mail or some bounce ,but there is less you can do >> with "broken" forwarders in any case. >> >> If someone decides to act as forwarder he has to honor existing >> dkim/dmarc/spf cases > > In an ideal world, yes. But some surprisingly large legitimate mail > handlers have not yet adopted or deployed DMARC.
you may wait to apocalypse ( not the x-men one ) *g > > Don't get me wrong, I am *eagerly* looking forward to the day when I can > *safely* set p=reject. But that day is not here yet. Maybe soon. > > i have serveral domains with differ dmarc policies, the strict ones most got problems with broken list servers ( if any ), however dmarc/dkim/spf are no antispam tecs ( perhaps sometimes they are helpfull with it ). Real world shows that botnets etc dont care about your policies in every case ( but this is very different with each domain ), so no policy promises you a rose garden it works just as designed Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
