I had a simular things. .. Waiting for the bounce... Greetz,
Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: rei...@bbmk.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] > Namens B. Reino > Verzonden: vrijdag 14 september 2018 10:52 > Aan: postfix-users@postfix.org > Onderwerp: Re: Double-Bounce > > On 2018-09-14 10:36, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 07:14, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote: > > > >> Benny Pedersen skrev den 2018-09-14 08:08: > >>> Dominic Raferd skrev den 2018-09-14 07:33: > >>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 00:29, Julian Opificius > >>>> <jo397...@barnlea.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Why is it that my system marks everything from you as > spam, Benny? > >>>>> Is > >>>>> it > >>>>> your tld? I've added you to my address book, but my server keeps > >>>>> spitting you out. > >>>> > >>>> Because the domain that he uses to send emails through > this mailing > >>>> list has DMARC p=quarantine setting: > >>>> # dig +short _dmarc.junc.eu TXT > >>>> "v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; > rua=mailto:report_...@dmarc.junc.eu; fo=d; > >>>> adkim=r; aspf=r; sp=none" > >>> > >>> postfix maillist is dkim safe, so if it breaks, show the link that > >>> breaks it, whitelist postfix maillist so it does not go into > >>> quarantine > >>> > >>> can i help more ? > >>> > >>> i get dmarc pass back on my post here > >> > >> DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 linode.junc.eu 2C5B31BE06F > >> Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine > >> dis=none) header.from=junc.eu > >> Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; > >> dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu > >> header.b=Aedk3uHj; > >> dkim-atps=neutral > >> Received-SPF: none (postfix.org: No applicable sender policy > >> available) > >> receiver=localhost.junc.eu; identity=mailfrom; > >> envelope-from="owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org"; > >> helo=russian-caravan.cloud9.net; client-ip="2604:8d00:0:1::4" > > > > Sorry you are right: your emails pass DKIM and also, when > going through > > postfix mailing list (but not all others), pass DKIM > alignment, so they > > pass DMARC. However, when sent through mailing lists, they > fail SPF, > > and (for DMARC) SPF alignment, so servers that make decisions based > > only on this (which is not the DMARC way) may choose to > treat them as > > spam. Mine don't, but I have seen your emails quarantined (or, > > previously, blocked) on other mailing lists, hence my > original comment. > > I think the postfix ML is not so "DKIM safe". In my case, it > causes my > DKIM signature to fail. I have now compared a message sent by > me against > other messages sent e.g. by Benny Pedersen, and concluded that my > configuration (using rspamd) was signing way too many fields. > I have now > reduced the number of fields and hopefully this message > should now come > back from the postfix ML with a valid DKIM signature. > > So in a way this message is just a test, but hopefully also a > clarification :) > > Cheers, > Bernardo Reino. > >
