* Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> [200119 17:54]: > Marvin Renich: > > Postsuper isn't overflowing with options; perhaps a more flexible and > > simpler design would be to have -e expire and -E expire and release from > > hold (if it is held). > > Yes, the idea of a third option came to mind. > > > The only con I see to this is "feature creep", which is minimal at this > > point. It only becomes an issue when postsuper starts getting more and > > more options. > > There is a limit to what postsuper can do, because by design it has > no dependencies on a running Postfix system.
I'm a little confused. Doesn't postsuper already have -H? If you add -e, what is hard about having -E set the flag, and then effectively act like the user also specified -H with the same queue_id? ...Marvin
