Alf Vark: > > > >> Still worth documenting? > > > > It is more effective to show an example with port 10025, > > than to talk about Postfix loop detection
> It wasn't obvious to me that using port 25 invoked different behaviour.
Your mistake is extremely rare. If I added extremely rare mistakes
to the Postfix docs then no-one would read it anymore. Sorry, you
are on the wrong side of the cost-benefit curve.
For mistakes like this, use a web search engine.
Wietse
n
