On 2021-03-03 16:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 2021-03-03 10:45, natan wrote:
This is server for incomming e-mail with many vdomain and vusers
On 03.03.21 11:38, Benny Pedersen wrote:
number of domains is irrelevant for backscatter
I check rbl in smtpd_recipient_restrictions
..
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
reject_rbl_client dynamic.rbl.tld,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client ips.backscatterer.org,
permit
move this to smtpd_client...
to make impossible whitelisting senders and/or recipients?
On 03.03.21 16:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why should recipients be whitelisted ?, to allow backscatter ?
mostly sender, but recipient possibly too
pushing reject_rbl_client to smtpd_client_restrictions make whitelisting
either impossible, which may be a huge problem.
OP also could add dbl testing in postfix, order of config lines is
important
order of lines is not, order of directives within smtpd_recipient_restrictions
is important.
i just say postfix is first match "permit" in client restrictions
disables rbl test in smtpd_recipient stage, hopefully i am not
sleeping
it does not. You can reject RBL at any stage.
btw, postscreen does that job much better than smtpd_*_restrictions
maybe long standing postscreen seqfault i reported to maillist is
solved now :/
I know of none and have noticed none. Maybe it's been solved for some time?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Have you got anything without Spam in it?
- Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it.
