On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 03:14:58PM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> It looks like '!TLSv1' is seen as something like
> "!TLSv1.x" ("no TLS 1.x at all") rather than "!TLSv1.0". Yes it is a stupid
> supposition but I cannot think of any other explanation. Is it possible?
No, !TLSv1 means no TLS 1.0.
The reason is more simple: there exist virtually no TLSv1.1
implementations as 1.2 was published only two years later, but there
still exist quite some TLSv1.0 implementations in legacy systems. So
all still existing systems support either 1.0, 1.2 or 1.3 (usually
including all the older versions as well.)
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
