> On 14 Aug 2021, at 12:54 am, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote: > > its then impossible to verify if there ever was an extra header or not, this > still make it less strong, it does not more secure or not with that feature > > this makes dkim more weak to have that as valid, and imho it does not being > needed
My advice to read the specification stands. If you haven't taken the
time to understand it, there's little to be gained by talking about it.
Best to desist.
--
Viktor.
