Thank you for the reply.  Yes, I am familiar with
reject_unlisted_recipient and the differences with
reject_unverified_recipient.  I help maintain a server control panel
(ISPConfig), and we had a use case where recipient address verification
 for local domains was used as a solution to avoid generating bounces:
 
https://git.ispconfig.org/ispconfig/ispconfig3/-/issues/5772#note_82522

Dropping support for the amavis scanner is not (currently) an option,
so that use case remains valid; I'd sure be open to ideas for how to
resolve that without the use of recipient verification.

Thanks,
Jesse



On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 16:01 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> >   I am trying to utilize 'reject_unverified_recipient' selectively,
> > so
> > that only addresses for domains which I host are verified
> 
> I might not be understanding your goals, but if you only want to
> verify 
> email accounts that the server is final destination for you don't
> want 
> to be using reject_unverified_recipient. You might be
> misunderstanding 
> what this feature is for.
> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
> 
> reject_unlisted_recipient is what postfix uses to check if the
> address 
> is valid for the accounts it accepts mail for.
> 
> The reject_unverified_recipient and reject_unverified_sender are for 
> checking if an email address hosted else where is valid. It causes 
> postfix to attempt to delivery a fake email to that account on
> another 
> server. I say fake in the sense that once it finds out that address
> is 
> legit it aborts the message and doesn't send an email.
> 
> A use case would be... when accepting email, to prevent spam, you
> could 
> check that the person claiming to be sending you that email is real.
> Not 
> a made up [email protected] address. If postfix tries to fake deliver
> an 
> email to the [email protected] address and it can't it would then
> reject 
> receiving an email from that address.
> 
> Postfix designers caution against using this feature as an everyday 
> every mail option as it has some draw backs which you read about on
> the 
> page linked above.

-- 
Jesse Norell
Kentec Communications, Inc.
970-522-8107  -  www.kci.net

Reply via email to