White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]:
> Many thanks for the sanity check, Mr. Postfix
> 
> I am using the explicit domain name rather than $mydomain mainly on client 
> machines because they are not guaranteed to have the same domain as the mail 
> servers.
> 
> Is there any way to shorten/remove the delay I saw in the MX-failover ?

By reducing smtp_connect_timeout from the default 300s to a more
reasonable value, maybe 10-30s.

Note that Postfix will shuffle the order of equal-preference MX
hosts, so that a down server will delay only some of the traffic.

        Wietse

> Again, many thanks for the quick response
> 
> From: <owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org> on behalf of Wietse Venema 
> <wie...@porcupine.org>
> Reply-To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org>
> Date: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 14:09
> To: Postfix users <postfix-users@postfix.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: MX records and relayhost: Am I going this correctly ?
> 
> White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS]:
> MX Records:
> 
>            mydomain.tld.   33           IN            MX         10 
> relay-1.mydomain.tld.
>            mydomain.tld.   33           IN            MX         20 
> relay-2.mydomain.tld.
> 
> with relay-1 and relay-2 having appropriate A and PTR records.
> 
> Then in /etc/postfix/main.cf, I have
> 
>         relayhost = mydomain.tld
> 
> I have seen this work with relay-1 unavailable.
> 
> This is the obvious (to me) approach when the domain has multiple
> MX hosts. It is also similar to the first relayhost  example in the
> stock main.cf file:
> 
>     relayhost = $mydomain
> 
> The outgoing message sat in the queue for a brief time, then went
> out through relay-2.
> 
> I found a Red Hat solution 
> https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faccess.redhat.com%2Fsolutions%2F4025391&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cdaniel.e.white%40nasa.gov%7Cec472cf769824ce55a8e08dab77d47f4%7C7005d45845be48ae8140d43da96dd17b%7C0%7C0%7C638024045956278652%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=WFi3rKroF5DsLvomCS5NcG9%2ByCKQOlC3ITI1KFW4oyU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> that suggests using
> 
>            relayhost = [relay-1.mydomain.tld]
>            smtp_fallback_relay = [relay-2.mydomain.tld]
> 
> This also works, but it would be less obvious to me.
> 
>                 Wietse
> 
> 

Reply via email to