On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:05:10PM +1300, Peter via Postfix-users <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 25/03/23 11:50, raf via Postfix-users wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 09:11:58AM +1300, Peter via Postfix-users > > <postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote: > > > > > * Don't add a Reply-To:. I actually question if this is really needed as > > > we > > > likely want replies to go to the list the vast majority of time anyways. > > > I > > > have seen other lists explicitly exclude this step and it works well. > > > > > > Peter > > > > Removing Reply-To would remove functionality that is > > important, even if it is only occasionally required. > > Off-list replies would become impossible. That is a > > loss of functionality. Just because something is wanted > > the vast majority of the time, it doesn't mean that > > it's OK to enforce it 100% of the time. > > Mailman has a setting that addresses this, reply_goes_to_list. According to > mm docs, this adds the original From: address as a CC instead of Reply-To. > This means that an ordinary reply should go to the list (as it's listed in > From:) and Reply All will include the original sender. An off-list reply > could easily be done by Reply All then removing the list address. > considering that off list replies are much less common than list replies the > additional action of removing the list address should not be of great > concern. > > Peter That's OK since it remains possible to reply off-list. It's not as easy as single-letter actions to reply versus reply-to-list, but not all MUAs have a reply-to-list command. cheers, raf _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
