Wietse Venema wrote in <4pshgn4l8vzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: |> I have some, starting after I updated from 3.8-202304331 to 3.8-2023040\ |> 2.
There are snapshots, there is source access beyond regular releases? ... |> There are two changes, one in util/match_list.c, and one in DNS client \ |> code |> dns/dns.h and dns/dns_rr.c. Investigating. | |In postfix-3.8-20230402 I updated dns_rr_create() and dns_rr_free(), |but forgot to update dns_rr_copy(). I'll issue postfix-3.8-20230406 |later today. ... I do not know whether i have asked that in the past already. postfix has a sophisticated DNS system, at least in respect to what it "can" (and .. well .. i would presume the implementation as such is also top), with DANE support and all that etc, also thanks to Viktor Dukhovni. It seems so square to have a need to use the C library resolver, or external library, or even code something yourself, in order to implement a policy or milter or filter for postfix. Even though possibly different TXT or so RRs are asked than what postfix itself (already) asks/ed. You know, i looked around a bit last year, on my too long TODO list there would be a DKIM (/ARC .. sigh, if that would only end up in DKIM itself) likely filter, and if only one could hook that DNS system of postfix; if i recall correctly from my superficial looking the necessary functionality would already be there entirely, what would be missing is a library to link against, or a simple text protocol and something to talk to. Would this be a thought for a future postfix extension? --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
