Your loop, based on Received: headers, newer at the top, older at
the bottom:

Received: from xavier.example.com (209.216.111.114) by 
CO1PEPF000044F7.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.241.197) with Microsoft S
Received: from localhost by xavier.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
30B17305F4A07;    Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:57:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xavier.example.com ([209.216.111.115]) by localhost (amavis, 
port 11024) with ESMTP id HL0GE5Q4v_xp; Fri, 11 Aug 2023
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (using TLSv1.2 
with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) 
Received: from CY5PR04CA0018.namprd04.prod.outlook.com by 
SA1PR02MB9916.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:
Received: from CY4PEPF0000EE3E.namprd03.prod.outlook.com by 
CY5PR04CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2603:10
Received: from xavier.example.com (209.216.111.114) by 
CY4PEPF0000EE3E.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.18) with Microsoft SM

In summary:

1 xavier.example.com ([209.216.111.114]) sends a message to Microsoft

2 After some internal hops, Microsoft sends the message to the
inbound MX xavier.example.com (209.216.111.115) for company A, B,
which filters it with amavis.

3 GOTO 1.

Which step is in error?

        Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Reply via email to