OK, I'm going to roll out 1.3.3. Solaris will have to be tested post facto... I will set up a Solaris VM here so it's easier to do, unfortunately it will be testing Solaris-on-x86, not solaris on sparc64 or something interesting like that.
P On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:21 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > I (OS/X 10.5, geos trunk) got no failures in regress_ogc under your > > patch. We'll see what it was tomorrow I guess. > > Okay, it's all sorted now - it was a mismatch between LF and CR/LF files > from SVN. The file in question (regress_ogc_expected) had an explicit > svn:eol-style property set to native; I've removed this but on a fresh > checkout I still get CR/LF endings on the *_expected files which causes > diff on MingW to fail. Hmmmm. > > I suspect that the regression tests will need rewriting in the near future > anyway, but as long as the release checkout comes from a UNIX-type SVN > client, there won't be any problems. I think we're about good to go at > this end - any takers for checking Solaris? > > > > > ATB, > > Mark. > > -- > Mark Cave-Ayland > Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts > http://www.siriusit.co.uk > T: +44 870 608 0063 > > _______________________________________________ > postgis-users mailing list > postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users > _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
