On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:26:25PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:51:12AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:26:15AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > > Erm, do old versions of IsValid still catch Inf geometries safely? > > > > > > If you have an HEXWKB I can give it a quick try against 3.1.0 > > > > 0103000020E61000000100000005000000737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540000000000000F07F000000000000F07F8F806E993F7E55C0304B29FFEA8554400634E8D1DD424540B5FEE6A37FCD4540737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540 > > 3.1.0 was unsupported. > 3.1.2 entered the infinite loop on ST_IsValid.
3.2.3 is good: POSTGIS="2.0.0SVN" GEOS="3.2.3-CAPI-1.6.3" PROJ="Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September 2009" LIBXML="2.7.6" USE_STATS strk=# select st_isvalid('0103000020E61000000100000005000000737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540000000000000F07F000000000000F07F8F806E993F7E55C0304B29FFEA8554400634E8D1DD424540B5FEE6A37FCD4540737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540'::geometry); NOTICE: Invalid Coordinate at or near point inf inf f --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ postgis-users mailing list postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users