I think I'd like to do option (b), leave in the deep check for Inf and
put upper level checks for Inf in the IsValid* calls. I've put all the
above code in checks for GEOS_VERSION < 33 so that it'll go dark as we
move forward. Sound OK?
p.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:26:25PM +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:51:12AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Sandro Santilli <s...@keybit.net> wrote:
>> > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:26:15AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> > > > Erm, do old versions of IsValid still catch Inf geometries safely?
>> > >
>> > > If you have an HEXWKB I can give it a quick try against 3.1.0
>> >
>> > 0103000020E61000000100000005000000737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540000000000000F07F000000000000F07F8F806E993F7E55C0304B29FFEA8554400634E8D1DD424540B5FEE6A37FCD4540737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540
>>
>> 3.1.0 was unsupported.
>> 3.1.2 entered the infinite loop on ST_IsValid.
>
> 3.2.3 is good:
>
> POSTGIS="2.0.0SVN" GEOS="3.2.3-CAPI-1.6.3" PROJ="Rel. 4.7.1, 23 September
> 2009" LIBXML="2.7.6" USE_STATS
> strk=# select
> st_isvalid('0103000020E61000000100000005000000737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540000000000000F07F000000000000F07F8F806E993F7E55C0304B29FFEA8554400634E8D1DD424540B5FEE6A37FCD4540737979F3DDCC2CC0F92154F9E7534540'::geometry);
> NOTICE: Invalid Coordinate at or near point inf inf
> f
>
> --strk;
>
> () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
> /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
