Hallo Simon
I believe there is a cmake3 package on RHEL which would give you the
version you need. Alternately you could modify
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0)
to read
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.7)
in CMakeLists.txt. I think this should work as I am not aware of using
any 3.0-specific features.
As to nanomsg/mbedtls I repeat my question: should we include a copy in
the distribution?
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:25 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote:
> Hi Robert and all,
>
> I tried to build on CentOS7 / RHEL7 and quickly saw that I'm not
> coming far.
>
> $ cd build
> $ cmake ..
> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:13 (cmake_minimum_required):
> CMake 3.0 or higher is required. You are running version 2.8.12.2
>
> Then, there is a nanomsg RPM in EPEL for RHEL7 but none for RHEL8.
> For
> mbedtls, it is also only in the EPEL repository, not in the
> distribution
> itself.
>
> Depending on something from EPEL is usually not something I like
> because
> EPEL is a moving target and if a maintainer doesn't continue to work
> on a
> package, it is removed from EPEL.
>
> So, for RHEL, it's a bit difficult to build RPMs for Pound 3.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> > Hallo Simon and other responders
> >
> > I really wonder, what dependencies were so difficult to find: I
> > would
> > very much like to make your life easier, but I would need some more
> > details.
> >
> > The idea was to supply the stuff which is not normally available in
> > distributions (hpack, uthash) even if it can be obtained from the
> > web.
> > I believe nanomsg and mbedtls are commonly available in
> > distributions
> > (and certainly can be downloaded), but I am quite willing to
> > include
> > them in future distributions if you think it would help.
> >
> > I am also curious what versioning problems you ran into - I don't
> > think
> > pound requires any specific version, please correct me if I am
> > wrong.
> >
> > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 20:55 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote:
> > > > Hallo everybody
> > > >
> > > > Pound v3.0 has been officially released in early November. We
> > > > would
> > > > really appreciate if you could drop a few lines regarding your
> > > > experience with it: how has it behaved in your case, is it
> > > > reliable,
> > > > did you do any performance testing, have you run into any
> > > > issues.
> > > >
> > > > Suggestions for new features in 3.1 are also welcome.
> > >
> > > Hi Robert,
> > >
> > > The problem I had with the new release is mainly that there are
> > > new
> > > dependencies and system requirements which are not easily met in
> > > our
> > > environment. I have provided RPMs of Pound in the past but didn't
> > > have the
> > > time yet to upgrade. I hope to do it in near future.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Simon
> > --
> > Robert Segall
> > Apsis GmbH
> > Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707
> > Tel: +41-32-512 30 19
> >
> >
> > --
> > pound mailing list
> > pound@apsis.ch
> > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch
> >
>
>
--
Robert Segall
Apsis GmbH
Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707
Tel: +41-32-512 30 19
--
pound mailing list
pound@apsis.ch
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch
