Hallo Simon I believe there is a cmake3 package on RHEL which would give you the version you need. Alternately you could modify
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0) to read cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.7) in CMakeLists.txt. I think this should work as I am not aware of using any 3.0-specific features. As to nanomsg/mbedtls I repeat my question: should we include a copy in the distribution? On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:25 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote: > Hi Robert and all, > > I tried to build on CentOS7 / RHEL7 and quickly saw that I'm not > coming far. > > $ cd build > $ cmake .. > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:13 (cmake_minimum_required): > CMake 3.0 or higher is required. You are running version 2.8.12.2 > > Then, there is a nanomsg RPM in EPEL for RHEL7 but none for RHEL8. > For > mbedtls, it is also only in the EPEL repository, not in the > distribution > itself. > > Depending on something from EPEL is usually not something I like > because > EPEL is a moving target and if a maintainer doesn't continue to work > on a > package, it is removed from EPEL. > > So, for RHEL, it's a bit difficult to build RPMs for Pound 3. > > Regards, > Simon > > > Hallo Simon and other responders > > > > I really wonder, what dependencies were so difficult to find: I > > would > > very much like to make your life easier, but I would need some more > > details. > > > > The idea was to supply the stuff which is not normally available in > > distributions (hpack, uthash) even if it can be obtained from the > > web. > > I believe nanomsg and mbedtls are commonly available in > > distributions > > (and certainly can be downloaded), but I am quite willing to > > include > > them in future distributions if you think it would help. > > > > I am also curious what versioning problems you ran into - I don't > > think > > pound requires any specific version, please correct me if I am > > wrong. > > > > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 20:55 +0100, Simon Matter via pound wrote: > > > > Hallo everybody > > > > > > > > Pound v3.0 has been officially released in early November. We > > > > would > > > > really appreciate if you could drop a few lines regarding your > > > > experience with it: how has it behaved in your case, is it > > > > reliable, > > > > did you do any performance testing, have you run into any > > > > issues. > > > > > > > > Suggestions for new features in 3.1 are also welcome. > > > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > The problem I had with the new release is mainly that there are > > > new > > > dependencies and system requirements which are not easily met in > > > our > > > environment. I have provided RPMs of Pound in the past but didn't > > > have the > > > time yet to upgrade. I hope to do it in near future. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Simon > > -- > > Robert Segall > > Apsis GmbH > > Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 > > Tel: +41-32-512 30 19 > > > > > > -- > > pound mailing list > > pound@apsis.ch > > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch > > > > -- Robert Segall Apsis GmbH Postfach, Uetikon am See, CH-8707 Tel: +41-32-512 30 19 -- pound mailing list pound@apsis.ch https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/pound_apsis.ch