> > This could be a good replacement for the regex plugin. Presumably this > will be maintained a lot better than my code. The binarie(s) and memory > footprint would probably be a god bit larger than my plugin + pcreposix > but who cares? > Do tell me if I can be of assistance.
Personally, I'd want to keep using your code for PowerPro basic processing. The pcre api does not do the key things I mentioned, and I have no interest in trying to rewrite what you already did, because I don't know enough about regular expressions and more importantly I'm sure I would not be able to do it better. The google wrapper uses C++ stl and looks like it will add about 300K of memory. Plus I suspect it will have its own subtle issues. But I might try it just to add an alternative for the sophisticates. BTW, as best I can see, it does not provide any error message processing from the RE compile. I'll take a look at the source to be sure! >
