Mikael Byström / 2006/02/03 / 07:04 PM wrote: >To really know, you have to listen in on the conversation with a tool >like Net Tool Box, Interarchy, Etherpeek or command line tools tcpdump or >tcpflow.
I have used EtherReal intensively before. The tools above might be better than EtherReal? EtherReal logs a lot, and tracing the correct packet syn/ack can be very tedious. I have to find time to sit down. Tim Lapin / 2006/02/02 / 06:22 PM wrote: >We need a little more to go on. It *might* be an unimplemented header >option used by the ISP but not by PowerMail. Or it could be an extension >to POP (or IMAP) that PM does not support. No, no. It's not anything like that. PM errors "unimplemented" at checking new mail. These accounts are not my active mail accounts but just webmaster mail addresses for my clients. The mail traffic is near zero, not even SPAM since these sites are not that active. I have mentioned this before, that I really, really wish PM offered log feature a la Outlook rather than warning dialog. I don't want to disable the warning since I have to know when POP of many I manage is down. Outlook logs so I can see when something is wrong, and I can see what time it started, yaknow? PM, I have to respond to the warning dialog every ingle time. This "unimplemented" warning pops up a dozen times a day, but not every time PM checks the new message. Very weird. Oh, and Snooze is supposed to snooze for one hour, but it is definitely not doing it. A bug? -- - Hiro [PROTECTED] <[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>
