OK, dumb question, how does one get FoxTrot to search the Powermail
database. It doesn't seem to do it for me.

Ron


CTM info wrote on 10/27/06:

>Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
>In the process of moving PowerMail to XCode and Intel, we discussed long
>and hard the matter of maximum database size and have decided, for
>technical and philosophical reasons, that the right thing to do was to
>keep the 2GB limit.
>
>First, a foreword: our strong feeling is that adding daily to an active
>database larger than 1.9GB for the sole purpose of having everything
>within the current database accessible "just in case" is like carrying
>around one's entire savings in one's wallet, for the sake of being able
>to buy anything you might run into (a house, boat or even a lake) "just
>in case" you run into such an opportunity in the course of day. In both
>cases, the risk of compromising what you're trying to protect greatly
>outweighs the benefit, and most people would rather be on the safe side.
>
>Furthermore, one of the features implemented long ago (in PowerMail 3)
>is the ability to switch user environments either by the ad hoc menu
>option in the File menu - which lets you open any number of offline or
>otherwise inactive 1.9 GB databases and perform searches in them with
>the built-in search facility. We even have a quick way of switching user
>environments, which is to alias offline Message Databases and double-
>click on them to go from one environment to another in a few seconds.
>
>Finally, we addressed the simultaneous aspects (having the ability to
>work on a large database, while being able simultaneously to search in
>other large databases) when we wrote FoxTrot Personal Search, which
>indexes *and previews message content of* any number of current and
>offline PowerMail database contents. The big advantage of using FoxTrot
>Personal Search for large archives over PowerMail is that you are
>accessing your archives in a Read Only fashion, which means you never
>run the risk of compromising a large amount of data, nor needing to
>rebuild it or so.
>
>So there you go. Yes, this is a political decision, as are many design
>decisions since we've been writing software; we've really tried to take
>a vast majority of usages into account before making it, and feel
>comfortable that we've done what is good for our users.
>
>Cheers,
>
>jean michel/ctm qa
>
>



Reply via email to