Since their (the NRC's) own guidance on ede use includes a section on
the use of a lead apron, I would be forced to conclude that that is an
individuals opinion, not based on any hard science.

 

At Entergy we have used the vests at at least 4 sites successfully.  We
have no issues.  Our implementation addresses the shallow dose and lens
of the eye dose specifically, so I believe that we have it covered.  We
have had NRC inspections at each site since the use of the vests.

 

I can give you contacts if you need to discuss this with anyone.

 

Fred Rosser

GGNS

RP Supervisor

601 437-6571

[email protected]

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:05 AM
To: powernet
Subject: Re: Powernet: Tungsten Vest

 

We bought them (late) but did not use due to weight and questions from
HP technical staff on usage.  During the post outage NRC inspection,
the regional HP inspectors voiced serious concerns about their usage and
spent time assuring themselves that we did not use them. So more work to
do before we use them. 

________________________________

  From: "Courtenay, Christopher C"
[[email protected]]
  Sent: 02/09/2011 09:26 AM EST
  To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
  Subject: Powernet: Tungsten Vest

 

Duke Energy would like to know the following:

 

For anyone who uses a tungsten/lead vest or apron, have you noticed any
abnormal or different than expected response of the TLD and ED
underneath the vest/apron other than the expected reduction in dose?
Specific items of interest are ED response changes, TLD response
changes, changes in observed shallow doses.  Thanks!

 

Chris Courtenay

Engineer, Duke Energy

980-875-5005

"To the optimist, the glass is half full.  To the pessimist, the glass
is half empty.  To the engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs
to be."

 

________________________________

The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. 

Reply via email to