The only thing that comes to mind is that you may want to use a pressurized ion 
chamber dose rate instrument (e.g., Fluke 541P or Ludlum 9DP).  They have a 
lower energy threshold than the standard ion chamber.  We use the 451P for 
checking our x-ray machines to good effect.

David Brehm
Radiological Engineer                                                           
                   Office: 402.533.7582
Radiation Protection - Nuclear Operations                                       
      Cellular: 402.237-9840
Omaha Public Power District - Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station                 
Pager: 402.561.3310
9610 Power Lane, Blair, NE 68008                                                
         [email protected]

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Holmes, Stephen J
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 8:03 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Eaton, Eric; Pell, Bryan; James, Scott; Garcia, Joseph D
Subject: Powernet: X-Ray Radiography Experience?

We have a proposal for a vendor to come on site and perform radiography using 
x-ray equipment. This equipment will emit x-rays of considerably lower energy 
(150 kVp max) than our typical gamma source term, and we are concerned about 
whether our instrumentation/dosimetry (calibrated to Cs-137) will adequately 
measure the dose from this device. We have previously performed pulsed x-ray 
radiography at Ginna, and had proven that our instrumentation performed 
satisfactorily, but this was at a significantly higher x-ray energy (300-400 
kVp max). We plan on using the Fluke-Biomedical 451B ion chamber, Landauer BA 
series OSLs, and SRDs (pocket ion chambers) paired with the DMC2000s EDs to 
monitor the work.

Do you have experience with x-ray radiography at your facility?

If so, did you do any testing, or anything else (such as a white paper), to 
justify your ability to properly monitor the exposure from the x-ray source?

If so, would you be willing to share the results or can you provide contact 
information?

Thanks,

-Steve

Stephen J Holmes, CHP, PE
Sr. Plant Health Physicist, CENG-RE Ginna NPP
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
585-771-3577


This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,
professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the
addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information
in this e-mail in any way, delete this e-mail and notify the sender. -EXCIP

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary 
information and is for use only by the intended recipient.  Unless explicitly 
stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, or 
acceptance.  If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that 
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to