On 2-Jun-07, at 10:54 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:

> On 6/2/07, John Sonnenschein <johnsonnenschein at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/1/07, thomas riddle <tom.riddle at sun.com> wrote:
>> > John,
>> >
>> > No offense taken at all. Onward... :)
>> >
>> > Your suggestion of a blog is actually a fitting idea. I honestly  
>> tend to shy
>> > away from commiting to one since what I write sometimes doesn't  
>> make sense to me
>> > when I read it. But once it got going it could be a good  
>> vehicle. There is
>> > nothing legal about it.
>>
>> Well, if you guys aren't comfortable keeping a blog, at least regular
>> email updates are really a must.
>>
>
> I personally value most the public source repository. It is by far  
> more complete
> and quick to grasp that any other mean. It also lowers the  
> participation barrier
> significantly. (No matter how skilled the SunLabs team is it is the  
> community
> that will keep the project alive)

I agree 100%, our gate /must/ be outside. However, an external gate  
can still be stalled by knowing there's code coming but not having a  
clue what's getting put in to it in a couple months due to passing  
through arbitrary legal processes, hence the blog/mailing list updates.

That being said, I suppose it could be run in a bazzar fashion ( like  
Linux ) where there is no such thing as a code lock & there's a race  
to be first to commit for credit. On the one hand that risks  
duplication of effort ( and with such a small dev. team that's not  
really a concern you can just ignore ), but on the other hand we  
don't get the result we have now ( stalled development because  
someone's working on code ). If I recall correctly one of the NetBSD  
founders regrets choosing the second model for precisely the reason I  
just attempted to outline.

I've personally not decided which is the better methodology at the  
moment... comments?

--
This Message has been Digitally Signed

PGP Public Key 0x437AF1A1
Availiable on hkp://pgp.mit.edu



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/powerpc-discuss/attachments/20070603/cf0d56ad/attachment.bin>

Reply via email to