To what extent do you think we could combine our efforts on unit tests? Standard (or at least shared) test vectors would really help, given how hard it is for programers to decode the RFC texts.
I’m willing to redo my tests (https://github.com/tom--/precis <https://github.com/tom--/precis>) to use some TBD machine-readable test spec. If others are interested, I’d contribute to authoring the tests. Tom > On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > Dear all, > > I’ve been working on an open source Java implementation for the Precis > framework since a few weeks and I'd finally like to share it with you: > > https://bitbucket.org/sco0ter/precis > > It supports the core Precis framework (RFC 7564), as well as the username and > opaque string profiles (RFC 7613) and the recently published Nickname profile > (RFC 7700). > > If anybody of you find some time and is familiar with coding/Java, I’d be > happy to receive some review and feedback from you, since I am planning to > publish a first version to Maven Central soon. > > There’s still one outstanding issue, which is the correct order of rules (RFC > 7564 and the profiles specify them differently, as a consequence an exception > is either thrown or not). See my source code comment here: > > https://bitbucket.org/sco0ter/precis/src/ecd82b75f3611dcb37ee0fd8890bfaf02b5caf9f/src/main/java/rocks/xmpp/precis/PrecisProfile.java?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#PrecisProfile.java-684 > > (I also asked about it here in this mailing list) > > Thanks for feedback. > > — Christian > _______________________________________________ > precis mailing list > precis@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list precis@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
