On Dec 21, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> wrote: > > >> Am 21.12.2015 um 22:05 schrieb Tom Worster <f...@thefsb.org>: >> >> To what extent do you think we could combine our efforts on unit tests? >> Standard (or at least shared) test vectors would really help, given how hard >> it is for programers to decode the RFC texts. >> > > Well… if there’s some XML (or other language-independent format) defining > input and expected output for different Precis profiles, I think this would > be nice. But still not too sure, if it’s worth the effort. Often I rely on > Java internal methods (e.g. for NFC normalization) and I guess they are > already well-tested.
I had the idea noticing that your unit tests have hard-coded test ins, expects and asserts, just like mine do. Alternatively I can copy from your tests to get better coverage in mine. Tom _______________________________________________ precis mailing list precis@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
