On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:58:26 -0800, GANNS.com wrote: >The natural way to reply appears to be at the top (reading bottom-up) unless >one wants to quote multiple parts and reply to each in paragraph form. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Green, Jr. >> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:16 AM >> >> Howdy, >> I prefer top posting, for the same reason as you. So, keep doing it if >> you prefer.
With respect to top-posting and netiquette, perhaps these couple of pages will be of interest: http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php (item 6) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00178.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting http://www.fscked.co.uk/writing/top-posting-cuss.html http://www.4qd.org/philos/Netiquette.html#toppost The internet community is pretty much agreed that top-posting is a Bad Thing(R). /Per -- http://www.spamchek.co.uk/freetrial - getting rid of spam and virus once and for all! _______________________________________________ Prime mailing list [email protected] http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
