On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:03AM +0000, Brian Beesley wrote:

> On Monday 27 October 2008 00:34, Dale wrote:

> > I do not know why this major upgrade was not announced in the mailing list.
> > Perhaps it WAS announced and a few of us did not receive the announcement.
> 
> Well I didn't get it.

I'm pretty sure there was no announcement.

> And there are a lot of technical reasons why I don't 
> want to move to v25 mostly that it is far too aggressive on system
> resources.

I never tested v25 on my systems, but if it's much more aggressive
than v24 it would definitely lead to retire from this project, which
I'd regret.

> If my systems don't start connecting to the "old" server soon I will be off 
> the project. I think the same will apply to a lot of people who are less 
> committed than I am.

I had the first connections of old clients this morning (around 8:00
UTC). But having all systems being displayed as /one/ so-called
"v4_computer" is extremly annoying and not really helpful.

> Already seriously annoyed by the new "interactive" server generated reports 
> which are a lot less useful than the old complete text listings.

Ack.

Christian
-- 
Christian Schulz       IRC: Zampel       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.bartali.dyndns.org/
"Der Kopf muss das dritte Bein sein."  ---  Christoph Daum
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to