On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:30:43PM -0500, Brian Beuning wrote:
> RAID 6 is cool technology, but does not make sense with just 4 disks.  
> There would be 2 data
> disks and 2 checksum disks.  Every logical disk block write, would do 3x 
> disk reads and 3x disk writes.

Yes, RAID-10 is a much more common configuration for four disks. Same amount
of space, much higher performance (especially write performance in
database-like workloads). The downside is lower reliability -- if you lose
two disks, there's a 50% chance that your RAID goes with it, but that kind of
scenario would typically be in “have backups” land.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
Prime@hogranch.com
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to