Niko wrote:- >And digital cameras are not there yet. We >are not fundamentalists, we've got a eye.
Maybe two eyes would help :-) !! Sorry , poor joke but then again so is the idea that digital cameras are not there yet. Onother apology...the old record stuck in a groove, but a high end digital camera exceeds film quality.That's one of the reasons why clients will pay a premium for quality digital capture. Can't pass comment on the current crop of self contained 35mm type bodies 'cause we don't use them professionally. I do have some reservations however about the concept of anti aliasing filters and subsequent resharpening. Dick Roadnight wrote:- >Sinar make a 22Mpixel back, and the Zeiss Jenoptic Eyelike 11/42 will do >42 Megapixels in multi-shot mode, and 11Mpx in single shot: they also do >a 16Mpx single shot, and, of course, with professional cameras you can >use movements. The Sinar does 22Mpixel in one shot .That translates to 130 Mb output per shot in 16 bit. It also has the capability of 16 shot capture in addition to four shot capture and to this you can add macroscan capability to give another approx 3 times increase over and above the 16 shot capture Big enough for that library ? Shangara wrote:- >I also suspect there are plenty of advertising photographers shooting >>>>>>with an 11mpx camera worth less than 6k. If you use the words 'advertising' and 'plenty' loosely. The majority of full on digital advertising photographers to my knowledge using high end systems , 'cause only the best will do for the demands imposed by most advertising briefs. Jumping back below the parapet. Regards, Bob Marchant. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
