On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 09:58 am, David Hoffman wrote:
It depends on how you define "commercial."
I wish! CROW states:
Section 2(1) does not entitle a person to be on any land if, in or on that land, he-
(t) engages in any activity which is organised or undertaken (whether by him or another) for any commercial purpose.
Much (all?) NT open land is defined as access land & falls within the act. And I think that in practice it doesn't depend on how I define 'commercial', it'll depend on how Mr N T Jobsworth defines it - & I've seen enough NT Jobsworths to know that the absence of a catering crew or cherry pickers will not be enough...
David Hoffman
Dear David
Isn't there a bit about people pursuing activities like painting and photography? I seem to remember something about easels and tripods.
I have no problems with NT staff. However that may change as everyone I knew has moved on after the recent re-organisation. English Heritage on the other hand are a different matter. I think finding WMD in Iraq would be easier than finding someone at EH to talk on the phone about photo permissions at Stonehenge.
Unless you know different?
Regards
Bob
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
