A colleague of mine is updating his ancient Mac equipment and has asked me whether the difference in expense of the Nikon LS 4000 scanner is worth it. (He has always used Nikon cameras and scanners) He is mainly scanning his archive of colour trannies (not kodachrome) and has asked me to ask prodiggers for their comments.
I have already persuaded him that Vuescan will bring out the best in either scanner, and he knows about the slow speed of both scanners if scanning full frame, 50Mb, 16 bit files with ICE turned on. If anyone has any experience, good or bad, with either scanners when scanning transparency film, could they please let me know? Either on list or off-list to me at simon(at)grosset.co.uk and I will pass your comments on. Thanks for your help Simon -- From: Simon Grosset Reply to: simon(at)grosset.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 7860 309161 =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
