I'm only picking up on the reading I've done recently about RGB workflows. It seems to me that many of the big movers in the industry want to shift the RGB workflow further down the chain. What they envisage is the RGB > CMYK happening just before printing. As I understand it the consensus is for "standard" RGBs to be in Adobe RGB. Many picture libraries are now using this.
I don't set the rules. If they say drive on the left I drive on the left.
You misunderstand what I meant by:-
<<How many people handle
files individually and one at a time?>>
I would have thought that most projects include more than one image. Books, magazines, catalogues etc. My assumption is that it is these image users who are going to create our future working environment. I may think my clients are ugly, capitalists but they are still the ones who pay the bills.
Regards
Bob
On Friday, November 14, 2003, at 11:58 am, Neil Barstow wrote:
14/11/03 10:14 am Bob Croxford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wroteWhat could be the advantage in converting sRGB to Adobe RGB (unless ARGB is, for some valid reason, imposed upon your workflow?).
Dear Neil
Surely workflow considerations are paramount. How many people handle files individually and one at a time?everyone, you can only open one at a time, Photoshop handles mixed RGB. Perhaps the photographer needs to convert all his files to the same workingsdace before sending off in your scenario. In many cases sRGB will be a better choice.
every workflow is special, I did say it was up to his own requirements.
Adobe RGB is not BETTER, it's often worse.
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
